SkyDemon Forums

American vs British teminology

http://23588_2017.hs2.instantasp.net/Topic11011.aspx

By Alti Dude - 1/23/2014 3:40:32 PM

There appears to be a difference between SD (or perhaps British?) and American /International /ICAO terminology. Apparently:
SD "track" = ICAO "course"
SD "course" = ICAO "heading"
I can understand that with UK roots and a large UK user base, SD had chosen to adopt UK terminology.
However it can be confusing for those having been trained, and used to flying, elsewhere.
I doubt there is any answer to this.
Comments, anyone?
Volare...oh oh...cantare...oh oh oh oh

By lhe - 1/29/2014 1:51:00 PM

by definition, heading is always magnetic
By what definition?

Certainly you can talk about true heading! When manually computing an operational flight plan, for each leg you start with the TRUE track and the wind (which is always given in degrees true except in landing clearances). This gives you the TRUE heading, to which you apply variation, giving you MAGNETIC heading.

Not to mention grid navigation in polar areas where headings are relative to the grid, not magnetic north.